Background: Male hypogonadism, characterized by testosterone deficiency, is highly prevalent among men with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These conditions often coexist, contributing to metabolic derangements and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) has been widely used to alleviate symptoms of testosterone deficiency; however, concerns remain about its long term cardiovascular safety. Aim: To systematically review evidence on TRT in hypogonadal men with T2DM and/or obesity, with a focus on cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: Databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) were searched until August 2021 using predefined terms. Studies were included if they assessed TRT in hypogonadal men with obesity and/or T2DM and reported CV outcomes. A total of 320 articles were screened, and 198 were eligible (86 RCTs, 112 observational studies). Results: Of the 198 included studies, 16 RCTs (n = 2,605 participants) and 15 observational studies (n = 1,836,513 participants) specifically assessed TRT’s impact on cardiometabolic and CV outcomes. Most RCTs demonstrated metabolic and symptomatic benefits without significant increases in major CV events, although a few trials showed neutral outcomes. Observational studies reported reduced mortality, improved insulin sensitivity, and decreased obesity related risk factors in TRT groups. However, some registry based retrospective studies highlighted possible increased CV risk. Conclusion: TRT in hypogonadal men with T2DM/obesity appears beneficial for metabolic and sexual health outcomes, but evidence regarding CV safety remains conflicting. Larger, long term randomized controlled trials are warranted before definitive recommendations can be made
Male hypogonadism is characterized by impaired testicular function resulting in reduced testosterone production, abnormal spermatogenesis, or both. A total serum testosterone level below 300 ng/dL is commonly used to define biochemical testosterone deficiency (1). The condition may arise from dysfunction at the testicular level termed primary hypogonadism or from impairment of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis causing secondary hypogonadism (2). Both congenital causes, such as Klinefelter’s syndrome and cryptorchidism, and acquired causes including chronic systemic illness, obesity, testicular damage, and endocrine disorders, contribute to its development (3).
A strong association exists between hypogonadism, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Obesity has reached epidemic levels worldwide and is characterized by excessive visceral adiposity that increases aromatase activity, leading to the conversion of testosterone to estradiol and suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis (4). This mechanism lowers circulating testosterone levels and promotes the “hypogonadal–obesity cycle,” characterized by increased fat mass, reduced muscle mass, and insulin resistance (5). Studies demonstrate that testosterone deficiency is present in up to 40% of men with T2DM, indicating a significant metabolic–endocrine interplay (6).
Men with coexisting hypogonadism and T2DM or obesity also exhibit higher risks of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Low testosterone levels are linked to endothelial dysfunction, dyslipidemia, systemic inflammation, and insulin resistance, all of which contribute to adverse cardiometabolic outcomes (7). Epidemiological data from population based cohorts indicate that testosterone deficiency may increase the risk of cardiovascular events by nearly 50%, emphasizing the importance of recognising hypogonadism as a cardiometabolic risk factor (8). Inflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 1 beta, further suppress gonadotropin secretion and worsen metabolic dysfunction in men with T2DM (9).
Globally, the prevalence of hypogonadism ranges from 10% to 40%, with higher rates reported in older adults and individuals with obesity and diabetes (10). In the Gulf region, population-based studies from Saudi Arabia and Jordan estimate testosterone deficiency rates between 8% and 24%, paralleling the region’s high burden of obesity and T2DM (11). The rising incidence of metabolic disorders underscores the increasing relevance of hypogonadism as a public health challenge. Effective diagnosis using testosterone assays, gonadotropin profiling, and clinical evaluation, followed by evidence-based management such as testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), remains essential in improving metabolic, sexual, and overall health outcomes in affected men (12).
Given the high prevalence of hypogonadism in men with obesity and T2DM, and the uncertainty regarding TRT’s cardiovascular safety, a systematic review is warranted to synthesize available evidence. This review evaluates the role of TRT in hypogonadal men with obesity and/or T2DM, with a specific focus on cardiovascular outcomes
Study Design: This study was designed as a systematic review to evaluate the effects of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) on cardiovascular outcomes in hypogonadal men with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. The methodology followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses) guidelines.
Search Strategy: A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to 15 August 2021 in the following databases:
The search used combinations of the following keywords and MeSH terms:
Boolean operators (AND/OR) were applied to combine terms. Reference lists of relevant reviews and included studies were also screened manually to identify additional articles.
Inclusion criteria
Studies were eligible if they met the following conditions:
Exclusion criteria
Study Selection Process
Figure. 1: Consort diagram of systematic review process
Data Extraction
Data were extracted independently by two reviewers into a structured form, including:
For RCTs, effect estimates and reported adverse events were recorded. For observational studies, relative risk, hazard ratios, and long term trends were noted.
Quality Assessment
Data Synthesis
Study Selection
In this review, initially a total of 320 articles related to TRT in hypogonadal men have been identified. However, only 198 studies were eligible for the review (including 86 RCTs and 112 non RCTs). 75 RCTs and 97 non RCT were excluded as these RCTs and non RCTs did not come under the purview of inclusion criteria. Benefits of TRT and a reduced adverse cardiovascular event in TRT were observed in some of the RCTs. These RCTs were reviewed. A few RCTs showed a neutral effect on cardiovascular events. In non RCTs, 15 studies observed benefits of TRTs and some of the supported TRT as there is a reduced adverse cardiovascular event in TRT.
Table 1: The main highlights of the observational studies included in this review are as follows:
|
SN |
Study (In-text Reference) |
Study Design |
Duration |
Intervention |
Comparison |
Sample Size |
Mean Age (years) |
Population Characteristics |
Key Findings |
|
1 |
Anderson et al. (2015) (13) |
Observational |
742 months |
Gel 90%, Injection 9%, Oral 1% |
Untreated |
4,736 |
61 |
Diabetes 32.6% |
Normalized testosterone levels not associated with major cardiovascular events |
|
2 |
Assin DJ et al. (2014) (14) |
Observational |
5 years |
IM testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg (baseline, 6 weeks, then 3-monthly) |
Untreated |
261 |
59.5 ± 8.4 |
Metabolic syndrome 100% |
TRT reduced obesity and improved metabolic syndrome |
|
3 |
Haider A et al. (2016) (15) |
Observational |
8 years |
Long-acting testosterone undecanoate every 3 months |
Untreated |
77 |
61 ± 5 |
Obesity/diabetes/CVD 77% |
TRT beneficial in men with cardiovascular disease |
|
4 |
Maggi M et al. (2016) (16) |
Observational |
2 years |
Gel 68%, IM 31%, Oral 2% |
Untreated |
999 |
59.1 ± 10.5 |
Diabetes 26%, hypertension 50%, hyperlipidemia 39% |
Higher cardiovascular events in older/high-risk men |
|
5 |
Muraleedharan et al. (2013) (17) |
Observational |
41.6 months |
Mixed TRT (IM, gel, oral) |
Untreated |
581 |
60 |
Diabetes 100% |
TRT improves survival in T2DM |
|
6 |
Shores MM et al. (2012) (18) |
Cohort |
90 days |
IM/patch/gel every 2 weeks |
Untreated |
1,031 |
60 ± 10 |
Diabetes 39.5% |
TRT reduces mortality |
|
7 |
Reddy KC et al. (2021) (19) |
Case-Control |
36 weeks |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg (baseline, 6 weeks, 12-weekly) |
Untreated |
66 |
66 |
Metabolic syndrome 27.3% |
TRT reduced waist circumference and improved insulin sensitivity |
|
8 |
Salman M et al. (2017) (20) |
Observational |
5 years |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg (baseline, 3, 6 weeks, then 3-monthly) |
Untreated |
261 |
58–70 |
BMI >30 in 62% |
Age not a contraindication; sustained weight loss observed |
|
9 |
Saad F et al. (2016) (21) |
Observational |
5 years |
IM testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg |
Untreated |
622 |
59.46 ± 7.05 |
Obesity 411; Diabetes 42.1% |
TRT causes sustained weight and waist-circumference reduction |
|
10 |
Sonmez A et al. (2011) (22) |
Observational |
12 months |
Testosterone esters 250 mg every 3 weeks |
Untreated |
332 |
21.68 ± 2.09 |
Metabolic syndrome 100% |
TRT unfavorable in young metabolic-syndrome patients |
|
11 |
Traish AM et al. (2014) (23) |
Observational |
60 months |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg (baseline, 6 weeks, then 12-weekly) |
Untreated |
255 |
58.02 ± 6.30 |
Obesity 96% |
Improved cardiometabolic profile |
|
12 |
Yassin A et al. (2016) (24) |
Observational |
10 years |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg every 12 weeks |
Untreated |
115 |
59.5 |
Metabolic syndrome 115 |
Reduction in blood pressure and cholesterol; no adverse cardiovascular events |
|
13 |
Yassin A et al. (2015) (25) |
Observational |
65.5/16.5/14.5 months |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg |
Continued vs interrupted |
262 |
52–65 |
Metabolic syndrome 147 |
TRT improves metabolic profile; effects diminish after discontinuation |
|
14 |
Vigen et al. (2013) (26) |
Retrospective |
27.5 months |
Injection/gel/patch |
Untreated |
8,709 |
60 |
Cardiovascular risk 53.2% |
TRT associated with increased cardiovascular risk |
|
15 |
Zhang LT et al. (2015) (27) |
Registry |
54 weeks |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg (6, 18, 30, 42, 54 weeks) |
Untreated |
58 |
56 |
Metabolic syndrome 53% |
TRT restored testosterone levels; reduced anemia and metabolic syndrome |
Table 2: Characteristics of RCTs included in this systematic review are as follows:
|
SN |
Study (In-text Reference) |
Study Design |
Duration |
Intervention |
Comparison |
Sample Size |
Age (years) |
Population |
Main Findings |
|
1 |
Abd Alamir M et al. (2016) (28) |
RCT |
12 months |
Testosterone gel 500–800 ng/mL |
Placebo |
165 |
71.5 |
Diabetes 31.8% |
Prevents coronary plaque progression |
|
2 |
Aversa A et al. (2010) (29) |
RCT |
24 months |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg every 12 weeks |
Placebo |
50 |
57 ± 8 |
Diabetes 100% |
Improvement in insulin resistance |
|
3 |
Aversa A et al. (2010) (30) |
RCT |
12 months |
Oral TU + IM TU |
Placebo |
52 |
57 |
Metabolic syndrome 100% |
Safe and effective; good testosterone normalization |
|
4 |
Bayram F et al. (2016) (31) |
RCT |
6 months |
hCG 1500 IU three times weekly |
Placebo |
36 |
27.5 ± 10.5 |
Metabolic syndrome 100% |
Lower cardiovascular risk; reduced metabolic syndrome progression |
|
5 |
Francomano D et al. (2014) (32) |
Pilot RCT |
54 months |
Testosterone undecanoate + diet/exercise |
Diet/exercise |
24 |
60 |
Obese men |
Improved long-term body composition |
|
6 |
Giltay EJ et al. (2010) (33) |
RCT |
30 weeks |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg |
Placebo |
184 |
52.1 ± 9.6 |
Metabolic syndrome |
Improves depressive and aging-male symptoms |
|
7 |
Groti K et al. (2018) (34) |
RCT |
12 months |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg every 10 weeks |
Placebo |
54 |
60.15 ± 7.23 |
Diabetes 100% |
No adverse effects; increased testosterone levels |
|
8 |
Hackett G et al. (2018) (35) |
RCT |
3.8 years |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg |
Placebo |
857 |
63.5 |
Diabetes 100% |
No increase in cardiovascular events after TRT |
|
9 |
Hackett G et al. (2017) (36) |
RCT |
30 weeks |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg |
Placebo |
189 |
61 |
Diabetes 100% |
Increased sexual desire |
|
10 |
Hackett G et al. (2013) (37) |
RCT |
52 weeks |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg |
Placebo |
190 |
62 |
Diabetes 100% |
Metabolic improvements within 3–6 months |
|
11 |
Ho CC et al. (2012) (38) |
RCT |
12 months |
Testosterone undecanoate 1000 mg |
Placebo |
120 |
40 |
Metabolic syndrome + diabetes |
Improved quality of life |
|
12 |
Jones TH et al. (2011) (39) |
RCT |
12 months |
Transdermal testosterone gel 60 mg |
Placebo |
220 |
59 |
Metabolic syndrome + diabetes |
Reduced insulin resistance and LDL; improved sexual health |
|
13 |
Khripun I et al. (2019) (40) |
RCT |
9 months |
Testosterone gel 50 mg/day |
Placebo |
80 |
51.5 ± 6.3 |
Diabetes 100% |
Improved carbohydrate metabolism |
|
14 |
Shigehara K et al. (2019) (41) |
RCT |
12 months |
Testosterone enanthate 250 mg every 4 weeks |
Placebo |
86 |
61 |
Diabetes + metabolic syndrome |
Multiple metabolic improvements |
|
15 |
Stanworth RD et al. (2013) (42) |
RCT |
13 months |
Transdermal testosterone gel 60 mg |
Placebo |
139 |
59 |
Diabetes 100% |
Improved insulin resistance and body composition |
|
16 |
Shaikh K et al. (2020) (43) |
RCT |
12 months |
Testosterone gel |
Placebo |
170 |
65 |
Diabetes, obesity, CVD |
TRT effective; high baseline hypogonadism prevalence |
Table 1 and Table 2 show the selected 16 RCTs and 15 non RCTs respectively. After reviewing the full text of 31 studies, observational studies and Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed. Last 20 years meta analyses were also reviewed. Selected RCTs included 2605 participants and Observational studies included 1836513 participants.
A total of 320 studies examining testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in hypogonadal men were initially identified. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 198 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 86 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 112 were observational studies. A total of 75 RCTs and 97 non RCTs were excluded because they did not fulfil the criteria of hypogonadal male populations, did not report cardiometabolic or cardiovascular outcomes, or lacked adequate comparator groups. Thus, 31 studies (16 RCTs and 15 observational studies) were included for final synthesis.
Across observational cohorts, TRT was associated with notable cardiometabolic improvements. Studies such as Anderson et al. (13), Haider et al. (15), Muraleedharan et al. (17), Shores et al. (18), Reddy et al. (19), and Saad et al. (21) demonstrated beneficial effects on survival, waist circumference, obesity parameters, glycaemic control, and inflammatory markers. Long term registry studies, including those by Yassin et al. (24,25), further supported durable improvements in blood pressure, lipid profile, and metabolic syndrome components, with no increase in major cardiovascular (CV) events. A few observational studies, such as Maggi et al. (16) and Vigen et al. (26), showed increased CV risk among older and high risk patients; however, these findings were affected by methodological limitations and were inconsistent with the majority of evidence.
The 16 RCTs included 2,605 participants and predominantly reported neutral or favourable metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes. RCTs such as Aversa et al. (29,30), Francomano et al. (32), Giltay et al. (33), Groti et al. (34), Hackett et al. (35–37), Ho et al. (38), Jones et al. (39), Khripun et al. (40), Shigehara et al. (41), Stanworth et al. (42), and Shaikh et al. (43) consistently demonstrated improvements in insulin resistance, body composition, lipid parameters, sexual function, endothelial markers, and quality of life. The Cardiovascular Testosterone Trial (28) reported reduced non calcified plaque progression, although its clinical significance remains debated. Importantly, none of the included RCTs showed a statistically significant increase in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Across all studies, TRT consistently restored physiological testosterone concentrations regardless of dose form (intramuscular TU, transdermal gel, patch, or oral formulations). Overall, findings from both RCTs and observational data collectively suggest that TRT exerts beneficial effects on metabolic health while demonstrating a neutral to beneficial cardiovascular safety profile
This systematic review synthesizes evidence from RCTs, observational studies, and major meta analyses to evaluate the efficacy and cardiovascular safety of TRT in hypogonadal men, particularly those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Overall, the findings strongly suggest that TRT improves metabolic health, body composition, sexual function, and survival outcomes, and does not increase cardiovascular risk when appropriately monitored.
Observational studies provide robust real world evidence that TRT is associated with reduced mortality and improved cardiometabolic outcomes. The large health system study by Anderson et al. (13) showed that normalization of testosterone levels was not linked to increased CV events. Similarly, long term studies by Haider (15), Muraleedharan (17), Shores (18), Reddy (19), Salman (20), and Saad (21) consistently reported improvements in waist circumference, body weight, insulin sensitivity, lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, and overall survival. Some studies indicated increased CV risk, including Maggi et al. (16) and Vigen et al. (26); however, these have faced significant criticism related to methodological flaws, misclassification, residual confounding, and improper follow up adjustments. When viewed together, the overall balance of evidence leans strongly towards cardiometabolic benefit rather than harm.
In RCTs, which offer the highest level of evidence, TRT showed predominantly favourable metabolic and symptomatic outcomes. Trials conducted in men with T2DM or metabolic syndrome—including those by Aversa (29,30), Bayram (31), Giltay (33), Groti (34), Hackett (35–37), Ho (38), Jones (39), Khripun (40), Shigehara (41), and Stanworth (42)demonstrated improvements in insulin resistance, HbA1c, lipid profiles, endothelial function, depressive symptoms, sexual health, and quality of life. Importantly, none of the RCTs showed an excess of MACE, supporting the cardiovascular neutrality of TRT in controlled settings. Although the Testosterone Trials CV arm (28) reported reduced plaque progression, longer term implications remain unclear. Nevertheless, consistent symptomatic and metabolic benefits were observed, with favourable body composition changes seen across multiple RCTs (32,33,39).
Meta analyses further reinforce these findings. Systematic reviews by Corona et al. (101,102), Ponce et al. (103), and other pooled analyses demonstrate no significant increase in myocardial infarction, stroke, or CV mortality among TRT users. Meta analytic data also demonstrate improvements in waist circumference, fasting glucose, insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and lean body mass. These findings align well with the RCT evidence and contradict earlier concerns derived mainly from flawed analyses. Collectively, the data support that TRT is safe when prescribed with proper patient selection and monitoring.
Taken together, the results of this review indicate that TRT offers consistent and clinically meaningful improvements in metabolic and symptomatic outcomes with no evidence of excess cardiovascular risk. The convergence of high quality RCTs, real world registry data, and multiple meta analyses supports the use of TRT as a therapeutic option for men with clinically confirmed hypogonadism particularly those with obesity, T2DM, and metabolic syndrome provided that treatment is individualized and carefully monitored.
TRT in hypogonadal men with T2DM and obesity is associated with consistent improvements in metabolic and symptomatic outcomes, including insulin sensitivity, visceral adiposity, and sexual function. While observational studies suggest conflicting cardiovascular effects, RCT evidence largely indicates neutral to beneficial outcomes, with no definitive signal of increased CV risk. Current evidence supports the cautious use of TRT in selected hypogonadal men with obesity and/or T2DM, accompanied by comprehensive risk assessment and ongoing monitoring. Larger and longer term RCTs are urgently needed to establish the cardiovascular safety profile of TRT in this high risk population.