Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
47 Views
6 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 12 (None, 2025) | Pages 504 - 508
EVALUATION OF LIPID PROFILE AND BODY MASS INDEX OF CHILDREN AGED 5 TO 15 YEARS BORN TO PARENTS WITH HISTORY OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE, HYPERTENSION AND DIABETES MELLITUS: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
 ,
 ,
1
Postgraduate Student, Department of Paediatrics, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan – 573 201, Karnataka, India
2
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan – 573 201, Karnataka, India
3
Professor & Head, Department of Paediatrics, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan – 573 201, Karnataka, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Oct. 2, 2025
Revised
Oct. 30, 2025
Accepted
Nov. 3, 2025
Published
Dec. 29, 2025
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Children who have a familial predisposition to metabolic or cardiovascular disorders are more likely to develop these conditions later in life. Detecting early signs—such as disturbances in lipid levels or irregular BMI—can support timely preventive measures and early management. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To study the lipid profile and BMI in children aged between 5-15 years, born to parents having ischemic heart disease (IHD) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension (HTN). METHODS: This is a case control study conducted with total of 130 children with parental history of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension (HTN) (Cases group; n=65). Children having no parental history of IHD and/or DM and/or HTN were grouped in Control group (n=65). BMI was calculated according to standard methods, and lipid profiles were measured by enzymatic colorimetric method in the blood sample of study subjects. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in distribution of patients between groups with regards to age (p = 0.600) and gender (p = 0.720). However, consumption of junk food ≥3 times/week by patients in cases group was relative higher proportion than those in control group (84.6% vs. 23.1%; p<0.0001). Among the case group, majority of the study subjects i.e., 46.1% were born to hypertensive father followed by diabetic father (27.7%), diabetic mother (13.8%), and hypertensive mother (12.3%). The lipid profile such as total cholesterol (p<0.0001), triglycerides (p<0.0001), LDL-C (p = 0.001), and VLDL-C (p<0.0001) were significantly at higher levels in cases group compared to control group. The HDL-C levels were significantly (p = 0.036) at lower levels in cases group compared to control group. The was slight increase in ratio of TG/HDL in cases group than in control group (4.09 vs. 3.68; p = 0.241). The mean BMI in the cases and control groups was non-significant (18.33 kg/m2 vs.18.09 kg/m2; p = 0.198). CONCLUSION: Among the lipid profile, the triglycerides, VLDL, and LDL were higher, and HDL values were lower in the children with a family history of HTN and/or DM, and/or IHD without significant difference in BMI among cases and controls. The derangement of lipid profile in children with a parental history of HTN and/or DM and/or IHD could be suggestive of genetic predisposition. This study findings highlight the importance of early interventions to address modification of lifestyle factors in children at risk of developing metabolic disorders due to genetic predispositions.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) in the Indian population tends to present earlier, progress more rapidly, and behave more aggressively. In India, 52.2% of cardiovascular deaths occur before the age of 70, whereas in developed countries the proportion is only 22.8% [1]. Additionally, individuals from South India exhibit a higher susceptibility to IHD, largely due to lifestyle patterns and high carbohydrate intake [2]. The current burden of morbidity and mortality reflects long-standing exposure to behavioral risk factors such as unhealthy diet, low levels of physical activity, and increased tobacco use, as well as biological risk factors like obesity, hypertension (HTN), dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus (DM) [1].

 

HTN is a major contributor to severe health complications in adults and is well recognized as a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [3,4]. Numerous studies over the past decades have highlighted the genetic influence on HTN and demonstrated familial clustering of blood pressure across various populations [5,6]. Research also indicates a rising trend in elevated blood pressure and HTN among children and adolescents [7], and those with higher blood pressure early in life are more likely to develop HTN and cardiovascular disease as adults [8]. Consequently, early detection and preventive measures in children with elevated blood pressure are essential. Understanding familial patterns of HTN between parents and offspring can help assess the risk of elevated blood pressure in younger populations, facilitating early prevention and management of cardiovascular conditions [9].

 

Children may have one or both parents affected by HTN and IHD, and conditions like DM, HTN, and IHD often coexist because HTN increases the likelihood of IHD, while DM predisposes individuals to both HTN and IHD. At any given time, one condition may be evident while another remains undetected [10]. Moreover, children with parental history of IHD have been shown to exhibit elevated levels of several lipid components, with total cholesterol being the most prominent [11].

 

Evidence also suggests that the risk of IHD can be significantly lowered through dietary changes and lifestyle modification, emphasizing the need for early interventions to delay or prevent the development of atherosclerosis.1 Overweight or obese children are particularly prone to dyslipidemia, especially when their waist circumference or body fat is elevated.12 Their lipid profiles commonly show reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and increased triglyceride levels [12,13]. Although low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values may fall within the normal range, the particles can undergo structural alterations, becoming smaller, denser, and more atherogenic [14]. Given this background, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the lipid profile and BMI in children aged 5 to 15 years who have parents diagnosed with IHD and/or DM and/or HTN.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study population: This is a case control study conducted with total of 130 children attending outpatient department or admitted for other minor secondary illness with parental history of IHD and/or DM and/or HTN at Department of Paediatrics, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences (HIMS), Hassan, Karnataka, India. A written informed consent was taken from all the patients participating in the study. Inclusion criteria: Children aged 5-15 years with parental age of 30-60 years and Children with either or both parents suffering from IHD and/or DM and/or HTN were included in this study Exclusion criteria: Children with hemodynamically unstable, congenital heart disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, hypothyroidism, Cushing’s disease, and parenteral use of drugs were excluded from the study. Study design: Children who met inclusion criteria i.e., with a parental history of IHD and/or DM and/or HTN were grouped in Case group (n=65) and children having no parental history of IHD and/or DM and/or HTN were grouped in Control group (n=65). Data collection: The socio-demographic, clinical examination and BMI data were recorded. BMI of the eligible children was documented and assessed according to the recommendations of Indian Academy of Paediatrics. BMI indicates total body fat mass and it was calculated by formula: Weight in kg/Height in meter [15]. BMI was compared with reference values, and where ≥ 25kg/m2 was considered as abnormal value. Fasting lipid profile was estimated by enzymatic colorimetric method in blood sample of study subjects after 8 hours of fasting and after ruling out the causes of secondary hypercholesterolemia viz. nephrotic syndrome, hypothyroidism and parenteral use of drugs. Lipid profile was also estimated in the blood samples of children aged 5 to 15 years that include cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL-C, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) of both Cases and Control groups. The lipid profiles were compared with reference values range. Statistical analysis: Data were entered in Microsoft Excel 2021 and statistical analysis was done using IBM Statistical Software for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. Categorical variables were represented in the form of percentages, and frequencies. Continuous variables were presented as descriptive statistics (Mean and Standard deviation). Categorical variables were analysed using the Chi-square test. Comparison of continuous variables between the study groups was done using independent sample t-test. p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The results on socio-demographic characteristics of the study subjects were represented in Table 1. Results depicted that there was no statistically significant difference in distribution of patients between groups with regards to age (p = 0.600), gender (p = 0.720), socioeconomic status (p = 0.720), and diet history (p = 0.720). However, consumption of junk food ≥3 times/week by patients in cases group was relative higher proportion than those in control group (84.6% vs. 23.1%; p<0.0001).

                                                          

The results on comparison of study subjects based on family history was plotted in Table 2. Results depicted that among the case group, majority of the study subjects i.e., 46.1% were born to hypertensive father followed by diabetic father (27.7%), diabetic mother (13.8%), and hypertensive mother (12.3%). The distribution of study subjects based on familial history was statistically significant (p<0.001).

 

The results on comparison of lipid profile were represented in Table 3. Results implied that the lipid profile such as total cholesterol (p<0.0001), triglycerides (p<0.0001), LDL-C (p = 0.001), and VLDL-C (p<0.0001) were significantly at higher levels in cases group compared to control group. Furthermore, HDL-C levels were significantly (p = 0.036) at lower levels in cases group compared to control group. In addition, ratio of TG/HDL was slightly higher in cases group than controls (4.09 vs. 3.68; p= 0.241).

 

The mean BMI in the cases and control groups was 18.33 kg/m2 and 18.09 kg/m2 respectively without any statistically significant difference (p = 0.198). There was no statistically significant (p = 0.357) difference in distribution of lean and normal proportion of study subjects among cases and control group (Table 4).

 

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics

Variables

Cases

Control

p-value

Age (Years)

5 – 10

35 (53.8)

32 (49.2)

0.600

11 – 15

30 (46.1)

33 (50.8)

Gender

Male

40 (61.5)

38 (58.5)

0.720

Female

25 (38.5)

27 (41.5)

Socioeconomic status

Upper Lower

40 (61.5)

38 (58.5)

0.720

Upper Middle

25 (38.5)

27 (41.5)

Diet history

Mixed

45 (69.2)

43(66.2)

0.720

Vegetarian

20 (30.8)

22(33.8)

Diet – Junk Food

<3 times/week

10 (15.4)

50 (76.9)

<0.0001

≥3 times/week

55 (84.6)

15 (23.1)

Values were expressed as n (%)

 

Table 2. Comparison of family history

Variables

Cases

Control

p-value

Apparently healthy

0 (0)

65 (100)

<0.001

Diabetic father

18 (27.7)

0 (0)

Diabetic mother

9 (13.8)

0 (0)

Hypertensive father

30 (46.1)

0 (0)

Hypertensive mother

8 (12.3)

0 (0)

Apparently healthy

0 (0)

65 (100)

Values are expressed as n (%)

 

Table 3. Comparison of lipid profile

Lipid Profile

Cases

Control

p-value

Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)

164.49 ± 22.48

137.4 ± 33.43

<0.0001

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

127.15 ± 14.25

104.26 ± 35.66

<0.0001

LDL-C (mg/dL)

103.24 ± 5.74

95.6 ± 17.6

0.001

HDL-C (mg/dL)

31.65 ± 13.41

35.61 ± 6.97

0.036

VLDL-C (mg/dL)

32.58 ± 4.44

20.52 ± 10.48

<0.0001

TG/HDL-C ratio

4.09 ± 2.64

3.68 ± 0.72

0.241

Values are expressed as mean ± SD;

LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HDL-C, High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; VLDL-C, Very low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TG, Triglycerides   

 

Table 4. Comparison of body mass index

Variables

Cases

Control

p-value

Lean

20 (30.8)

25 (38.5)

0.357

Normal

45 (69.2)

40(61.5)

Mean ± SD

18.33 ± 1.00

18.09 ± 1.08

0.198

Values are expressed as n (%) unless otherwise stated

DISCUSSION

Recognizing metabolic and cardiovascular risks early in children who have a family history of IHD, DM, and HTN is essential for timely preventive strategies. Evidence showed that precursors of Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disorders can appear during childhood, particularly among those with hereditary susceptibility. Family history thus serves as an important indicator for identifying children at elevated risk. Research confirms that children with first- or second-degree relatives affected by diabetes or cardiovascular diseases have a greater probability of developing these conditions themselves [16].

 

Lifestyle behaviors—especially diet and physical activity—also play a pivotal role in shaping metabolic risk [17]. Children born to families with obesity or cardiometabolic disorders commonly exhibit increased BMI and greater adiposity, highlighting the combined influence of genetic and environmental factors in childhood obesity [18]. Considering this background, the present case-control study aimed to assess lipid parameters—total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C, VLDL-C, TG/HDL ratio—and BMI in children aged 5–15 years with parental history of IHD and/or DM and/or HTN.

 

The significant differences in lipid markers between children of diabetic parents and those of non-diabetic parents observed in our study are well supported by previous research. Numerous studies report that parental diabetes, particularly maternal diabetes, negatively affects the lipid profiles of offspring by increasing total cholesterol, LDL-C, VLDL-C, and triglycerides while lowering HDL-C. Makedou et al., found markedly higher mean total cholesterol and LDL-C in children with diabetic family history compared to controls [19]. These outcomes align with those of Pac et al., who reported that maternal history of Type 2 Diabetes correlated with elevated LDL-C levels [20]. Additionally, Makedou et al., in an investigation involving children with a family history of CHD or hyperlipidemia, reported significantly higher values of total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, and apolipoprotein B100 relative to controls [19].

 

Existing literature also emphasizes the usefulness of the TG/HDL-C ratio as a marker for insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in both pediatric and adult populations [21]. Quijada et al., noted that obesity raises cardiovascular risk in children and that the TG/HDL-C ratio can reliably identify those with heightened susceptibility [22]. Concurrently, in our study the ratio of TG/HDL-C was non-significantly higher in the case group compared to the control group (4.77 vs. 4.09).

 

Our study further revealed a markedly higher intake of junk food among children with a parental history of IHD, DM, and HTN. Specifically, 84.62% of cases consumed junk food 3–4 times per week, compared to only 23.08% among controls—a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001). This pattern highlights the role of dietary behaviors in elevating metabolic risk among genetically predisposed children. Similar findings have been documented by Mascarenhas et al., who reported that unhealthy eating patterns, especially high junk-food consumption, contributed to unfavorable lipid profiles in 9-year-old schoolchildren [23]. Likewise, Singh et al., indicated that regular junk-food intake is a major driver of childhood obesity, further exacerbated by inactivity, media influence, and easy access to calorie-dense foods [24].

 

Despite these associations, our study found no significant difference in BMI between children with and without a family history of metabolic conditions such as IHD, DM, and HTN. This suggests that during childhood, BMI alone may not sufficiently reflect underlying metabolic risk, possibly because early metabolic changes may not yet be evident through anthropometric indicators. Supporting this, previous studies have shown that BMI is an unreliable measure of adiposity in young overweight or obese children and should not be used as the sole marker of metabolic health [25]. The presence of metabolic disorders in parents of the case group further highlights the strong genetic contribution to metabolic outcomes in offspring. The development of metabolic syndrome is widely considered to involve a complex interaction between inherited tendencies and environmental exposures [26].

CONCLUSION

Among the lipid profile, the triglycerides, VLDL, and LDL were higher, and HDL values were lower in the children with a family history of HTN and/or DM, and/or IHD without significant difference in BMI among cases and controls. The derangement of lipid profile in children with a parental history of HTN and/or DM and/or IHD could be suggestive of genetic predisposition. This study findings highlight the importance of early interventions to address modification of lifestyle factors in children at risk of developing metabolic disorders due to genetic predispositions.

REFERENCES

1.       Savitha MR, Krishnappa S, Jayaram S. The study of lipid profile and other cardiovascular risk factors in children born to parents having premature ischemic heart disease. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2019; 6:932-9.

2.       Kumar S, Roy S. Tropical heart disease in India. Dyslipidemia in Indians. Mumbai. Indian College of Physicians. 2005:109-8.

3.       Li FR, He Y, Yang HL, Liu HM, Zhou R, Chen GC, Wu XX, Zou MC, Wang JY, Wu XB. Isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and risk of cardiovascular disease: a large prospective cohort study. J Hypertens. 2021;39(8):1594-1601.

4.       Wan EYF, Chin WY, Yu EYT, Chen J, Tse ETY, Wong CKH, Ha TKH, Chao DVK, Tsui WWS, Lam CLK. Retrospective cohort study to investigate the 10-year trajectories of disease patterns in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus on subsequent cardiovascular outcomes and health service utilisation: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e038775.

5.       Li AL, Fang X, Zhang YY, Peng Q, Yin XH. Familial aggregation and heritability of hypertension in Han population in Shanghai China: a case-control study. Clin Hypertens. 2019; 25:17.

6.       Gupta-Malhotra M, Hashmi SS, Barratt MS, Milewicz DM, Shete S. Familial aggregation of first-degree relatives of children with essential hypertension. Blood Press. 2018;27(5):289-296.

7.       Din-Dzietham R, Liu Y, Bielo MV, Shamsa F. High blood pressure trends in children and adolescents in national surveys, 1963 to 2002. Circulation. 2007;116(13):1488-96.

8.       Yang L, Magnussen CG, Yang L, Bovet P, Xi B. Elevated Blood Pressure in Childhood or Adolescence and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adulthood: A Systematic Review. Hypertension. 2020;75(4):948-955.

9.       Jang S, Kim ST, Kim YK, Song YH. Association of blood pressure and hypertension between parents and offspring: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Hypertens Res. 2023;46(2):368-376.

10.    Kulkarni KB, Banga U. Children genetically predisposed: the added perspectives. Indian Pediatr. 2002; 39:884–5.

11.    Shah N, Kelly AM, Cox N, Wong C, Soon K. Myocardial Infarction in the "Young": Risk Factors, Presentation, Management and Prognosis. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25(10):955-60.

12.    Caprio S, Hyman LD, McCarthy S, Lange R, Bronson M, Tamborlane WV. Fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in obese adolescent girls: importance of the intraabdominal fat depot. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(1):12-7.

13.    Morrison JA, Barton BA, Biro FM, Daniels SR, Sprecher DL. Overweight, fat patterning, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in black and white boys. J Pediatr. 1999;135(4):451-7.

14.    Zalesin KC, Franklin BA, Miller WM, Peterson ED, McCullough PA. Impact of obesity on cardiovascular disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008;37(3):663-84, ix.

15.    Negus BH, Willard JE, Glamann DB, Landau C, Snyder RW 2nd, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Coronary anatomy and prognosis of young, asymptomatic survivors of myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 1994;96(4):354-8.

16.    Valdez R, Greenlund KJ, Khoury MJ, Yoon PW. Is family history a useful tool for detecting children at risk for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases? A public health perspective. Pediatrics. 2007;120(Suppl 2):S78–86.

17.    Lee CY, Lin WT, Tsai S, Hung YC, Wu PW, Yang YC, Chan TF, Huang HL, Weng YL, Chiu YW, Huang CT, Lee CH. Association of Parental Overweight and Cardiometabolic Diseases and Pediatric Adiposity and Lifestyle Factors with Cardiovascular Risk Factor Clustering in Adolescents. Nutrients. 2016;8(9):567.

18.    Corica D, Aversa T, Valenzise M, Messina MF, Alibrandi A, De Luca F, Wasniewska M. Does Family History of Obesity, Cardiovascular, and Metabolic Diseases Influence Onset and Severity of Childhood Obesity? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018; 9:187.

19.    Makedou A, Kourti M, Makedou K, Lazaridou S, Varlamis G. Lipid profile of children with a family history of coronary heart disease or hyperlipidemia: 9-year experience of an outpatient clinic for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Angiology. 2005;56(4):391-5.

20.    Pac FA, Yigitoglu MR, Kalayci AG, Adam B, Atesal S, Kürkcüoglu M. Plasma lipid profile in obese children and in children with hereditary predisposition to coronary heart disease. Jpn Heart J. 1992;33(4):445-50.

21.    Yoo DY, Kang YS, Kwon EB, Yoo EG. The triglyceride-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in overweight Korean children and adolescents. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;22(3):158–63.

22.    Quijada Z, Paoli M, Zerpa Y, Camacho N, Cichetti R, Villarroel V, Arata-Bellabarba G, Lanes R. The triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio as a marker of cardiovascular risk in obese children; association with traditional and emergent risk factors. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008;9(5):464-71.

23.    Mascarenhas P, Furtado JM, Almeida SM, Ferraz ME, Ferraz FP, Oliveira P. Pediatric Overweight, Fatness and Risk for Dyslipidemia Are Related to Diet: A Cross-Sectional Study in 9-year-old Children. Nutrients. 2023;15(2):329.

24.    Singh SA, Dhanasekaran D, Ganamurali N, LP, Sabarathinam S. Junk food-induced obesity: a growing threat to youngsters during the pandemic. Obes Med. 2021; 26:100364.

25.    Vanderwall C, Randall Clark R, Eickhoff J, Carrel AL. BMI is a poor predictor of adiposity in young overweight and obese children. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):135.

26.          Karimzadeh P, Taghdiri MM, Abasi E, Hassanvand Amouzadeh M, Naghavi Z, Ghazavi A, Nasehi MM, Alipour A. Metabolic Screening in Children with Neurodevelopmental Delay, Seizure and/or Regression. Iran J Child Neurol. 2017;11(3):42-47.

Recommended Articles
Research Article
Analysis of turn around time (TAT) for common biochemical parameters and its root cause for delay in a tertiary care centre
...
Published: 29/12/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Investigating a potential correlation between ABO-Rh blood types and the occurrence of Medulloblastoma
...
Published: 09/10/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Incidence, Consequences, Risk Factors, and Preventive Measures of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective and Prospective Observational Study
...
Published: 29/12/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
A STUDY OF COMPARISON OF LEVOBUPIVACAINE 0.5% WITH DEXAMETHASONE AND 0.5% LEVOBUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK
...
Published: 29/12/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.