Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections globally, with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae being predominant pathogens. The emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains of these organisms has significantly complicated treatment due to their multidrug resistance. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of selective antibiotics against ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urine samples over a two-month period. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Faridabad, from February to March. A total of 234 ESBL-positive isolates were obtained from urine samples. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the VITEK 2 Compact system. The susceptibility patterns of both E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were analyzed for commonly used antibiotics. Results: The highest sensitivity among E. coli isolates was observed for amikacin (91.67%), meropenem (90.00%), and imipenem (87.50%). Klebsiella pneumoniae showed the greatest sensitivity to imipenem (93.33%), ertapenem (86.67%), and meropenem (86.67%). Both organisms demonstrated high resistance to ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Nitrofurantoin and piperacillin-tazobactam also retained significant efficacy against both pathogens. Conclusion: Carbapenems and amikacin remain the most effective antibiotics for the treatment of UTIs caused by ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The study underscores the need for continuous local antimicrobial surveillance to guide empirical therapy and antibiotic stewardship.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections globally, affecting people across all age groups and accounting for a significant proportion of outpatient and inpatient antibiotic prescriptions (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). Women are particularly susceptible, with nearly 50% expected to experience at least one UTI in their lifetime, often with recurrent episodes (Foxman, 2014). UTIs can present as uncomplicated cystitis or progress to severe complications such as pyelonephritis and urosepsis, especially when caused by drug-resistant pathogens.
One of the most alarming trends in recent years is the increasing incidence of UTIs caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms. ESBLs are enzymes that confer resistance to most beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins, cephalosporins, and monobactams, thus severely limiting the effectiveness of these commonly used treatments (Paterson & Bonomo, 2005). The spread of ESBL-producing bacteria has become a major public health concern, particularly in hospital settings and among patients with recurrent or complicated UTIs (Rodríguez-Baño et al., 2018). Among ESBL-producing pathogens, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are the leading uropathogens implicated in both community-acquired and healthcare-associated UTIs (Peirano & Pitout, 2019). The resistance exhibited by these organisms is not limited to beta-lactams; many also display multidrug resistance to commonly used antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, further complicating empirical therapy (Doi et al., 2017). Carbapenems are often considered the last-resort treatment for infections caused by ESBL producers, but overuse of these agents contributes to the global rise in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) (van Duin & Doi, 2017).
The resistance patterns of ESBL-producing uropathogens can vary significantly across geographical locations, healthcare institutions, and patient populations, underscoring the importance of local surveillance data in guiding empirical antibiotic selection (Pitout & Laupland, 2008). Timely initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is crucial, as delays in appropriate treatment have been associated with poor clinical outcomes, including increased rates of hospitalization, complications, and mortality (Tamma et al., 2014).
Given these concerns, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of selective antibiotics against ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urine samples at Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Sector Faridabad. By assessing the local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns over a two-month period, this research aims to provide actionable data to inform empirical treatment strategies, improve patient outcomes, and support institutional antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
This prospective observational study was conducted over a period of two months, from February to March 2025, in the Department of Microbiology at Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Sector Faridabad. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of selective antibiotics in treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Urine samples were collected from patients of both genders and all age groups who presented with clinical symptoms suggestive of UTIs and were referred for routine microbiological evaluation. Midstream clean-catch urine samples were obtained under sterile conditions and immediately transported to the microbiology laboratory for processing.
Upon receipt, the samples were subjected to standard microbiological procedures, including culture on cystine-lactose-electrolyte-deficient (CLED) agar. The plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 18-24 hours. Significant bacteriuria was confirmed based on colony counts, and the isolates were identified to the species level using routine biochemical tests and automated identification through the VITEK 2 Compact system (bioMérieux, France).
Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the VITEK 2 Compact system according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. ESBL production was confirmed by the VITEK 2 system based on automated detection algorithms. For E. coli, the antibiotics tested included: amikacin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefepime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, fosfomycin, imipenem, meropenem, nitrofurantoin, piperacillin-tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and gentamicin. For Klebsiella pneumoniae, the antibiotics tested were: amikacin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefepime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, nitrofurantoin, piperacillin-tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and gentamicin. Fosfomycin susceptibility was not evaluated for Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Isolates were categorized as sensitive or resistant based on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints recommended by the CLSI. All quality control procedures were strictly followed throughout the study using appropriate control strains. Data on patient demographics, isolate distribution by gender, and month of isolation were recorded and analyzed.
The results were compiled and statistically evaluated to determine the sensitivity and resistance patterns of the antibiotics tested against the isolated ESBL-producing uropathogens. The study strictly adhered to ethical standards, and patient confidentiality was maintained at all stages.
During the two-month study period, a total of 186 ESBL-producing isolates were obtained from urine samples of patients with suspected urinary tract infections at Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Faridabad. The distribution of these isolates by organism and gender is presented in Table 1. Subsequent, tables illustrate the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the isolated organisms and provide a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of various antibiotics tested.
Table 1: Distribution of ESBL-Positive Isolates by Organism and Gender
Organism |
Male Patients (n) |
Female Patients (n) |
Total Isolates (n) |
Escherichia coli |
70 |
100 |
170 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae |
4 |
12 |
16 |
Total |
74 |
112 |
186 |
Table 1 shows the consolidated distribution of ESBL-positive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates collected from urine samples over the two-month study period. Among the 170 E. coli isolates, 70 were from male patients and 100 from female patients. For Klebsiella pneumoniae, 4 isolates were from male patients and 12 from female patients. Overall, ESBL-producing E. coli accounted for 91.4% of the total isolates, indicating its predominance in urinary tract infections during the study period.
Table 2: Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of ESBL-Producing E. coli
Antibiotic |
Sensitivity (%) |
Resistance (%) |
Amikacin |
91.67% |
8.33% |
Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid |
25.00% |
75.00% |
Cefepime |
45.83% |
54.17% |
Ceftriaxone |
12.50% |
87.50% |
Cefuroxime |
16.67% |
83.33% |
Ciprofloxacin |
8.33% |
91.67% |
Ertapenem |
83.33% |
16.67% |
Fosfomycin |
79.17% |
20.83% |
Imipenem |
87.50% |
12.50% |
Meropenem |
90.00% |
10.00% |
Nitrofurantoin |
83.33% |
16.67% |
Piperacillin-Tazobactam |
85.00% |
15.00% |
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole |
41.67% |
58.33% |
Gentamicin |
75.00% |
25.00% |
Table 2 presents the antibiotic susceptibility profile of ESBL-producing E. coli. High sensitivity was observed for amikacin (91.67%), meropenem (90.00%), imipenem (87.50%), piperacillin-tazobactam (85.00%), nitrofurantoin (83.33%), and ertapenem (83.33%). Moderate sensitivity was seen with gentamicin (75.00%) and fosfomycin (79.17%). In contrast, high resistance was noted to ciprofloxacin (91.67%), ceftriaxone (87.50%), cefuroxime (83.33%), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (75.00%), indicating limited effectiveness of these commonly used antibiotics.
Table 3: Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of ESBL-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
Antibiotic |
Sensitivity (%) |
Resistance (%) |
Amikacin |
80.00% |
20.00% |
Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid |
20.00% |
80.00% |
Cefepime |
46.67% |
53.33% |
Ceftriaxone |
13.33% |
86.67% |
Cefuroxime |
13.33% |
86.67% |
Ciprofloxacin |
6.67% |
93.33% |
Ertapenem |
86.67% |
13.33% |
Imipenem |
93.33% |
6.67% |
Meropenem |
86.67% |
13.33% |
Nitrofurantoin |
60.00% |
40.00% |
Piperacillin-Tazobactam |
80.00% |
20.00% |
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole |
40.00% |
60.00% |
Gentamicin |
73.33% |
26.67% |
Table 3 summarizes the susceptibility patterns of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. The isolates showed the highest sensitivity to imipenem (93.33%), ertapenem (86.67%), meropenem (86.67%), piperacillin-tazobactam (80.00%), and amikacin (80.00%). Moderate sensitivity was observed with gentamicin (73.33%) and nitrofurantoin (60.00%). The isolates exhibited significant resistance to ciprofloxacin (93.33%), ceftriaxone (86.67%), cefuroxime (86.67%), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (80.00%). These findings support the preferential use of carbapenems and amikacin for treatment.
Table 4: Comparative Sensitivity of Key Antibiotics Against ESBL-Producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae
Antibiotic |
E. coli Sensitivity (%) |
Klebsiella pneumoniae Sensitivity (%) |
Amikacin |
91.67% |
80.00% |
Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid |
25.00% |
20.00% |
Cefepime |
45.83% |
46.67% |
Ceftriaxone |
12.50% |
13.33% |
Cefuroxime |
16.67% |
13.33% |
Ciprofloxacin |
8.33% |
6.67% |
Ertapenem |
83.33% |
86.67% |
Imipenem |
87.50% |
93.33% |
Meropenem |
90.00% |
86.67% |
Nitrofurantoin |
83.33% |
60.00% |
Piperacillin-Tazobactam |
85.00% |
80.00% |
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole |
41.67% |
40.00% |
Gentamicin |
75.00% |
73.33% |
Table 4 provides a comparative analysis of key antibiotics against ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Both organisms demonstrated high sensitivity to carbapenems (imipenem: 87.50% in E. coli, 93.33% in Klebsiella pneumoniae; meropenem: 90.00% and 86.67%, respectively). Amikacin showed excellent sensitivity in both groups (91.67% in E. coli and 80.00% in Klebsiella pneumoniae). Significant resistance to ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was common to both organisms, with ciprofloxacin sensitivity rates as low as 8.33% for E. coli and 6.67% for Klebsiella pneumoniae. These findings underline the critical need for targeted therapy based on local susceptibility patterns.
Carbapenems, amikacin, nitrofurantoin, and piperacillin-tazobactam demonstrated the highest effectiveness against ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in this study. Ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid exhibited high resistance rates, making them less suitable for empirical therapy in this setting. This study highlights the importance of continuous local surveillance to guide effective antibiotic stewardship.
1. CLSI. (2023). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 33rd ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
2. Doi, Y., Iovleva, A., & Bonomo, R. A. (2017). The ecology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) in the developed world. Journal of Travel Medicine, 24(suppl_1), S44–S51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/tax076
3. Flores-Mireles, A. L., Walker, J. N., Caparon, M., & Hultgren, S. J. (2015). Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 13(5), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3432
4. Foxman, B. (2014). Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 28(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003
5. Gupta, K., Hooton, T. M., Naber, K. G., Wullt, B., Colgan, R., Miller, L. G., Moran, G. J., Nicolle, L. E., Raz, R., Schaeffer, A. J., & Soper, D. E. (2011). International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 52(5), e103–e120. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq257
6. Paterson, D. L., & Bonomo, R. A. (2005). Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a clinical update. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 18(4), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.18.4.657-686.2005
7. Peirano, G., & Pitout, J. D. D. (2019). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: update on molecular epidemiology and treatment options. Drugs, 79(14), 1529–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01180-3
8. Pitout, J. D. D., & Laupland, K. B. (2008). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 8(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70041-0
9. Rodríguez-Baño, J., Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, B., Machuca, I., & Pascual, Á. (2018). Treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-, AmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 31(2), e00079-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00079-17
10. Tamma, P. D., Han, J. H., Rock, C., Harris, A. D., Lautenbach, E., Hsu, A. J., & Cosgrove, S. E. (2014). Carbapenem therapy is associated with improved survival compared with piperacillin-tazobactam for patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase bacteremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 60(9), 1319–1325. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu109
11. van Duin, D., & Doi, Y. (2017). The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence, 8(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2016.1222343