Background: Young-onset hypertension associates with oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and hypercoagulability. This study evaluates serum D-dimer levels and their correlations with oxidative stress markers (MDA, Ox-LDL) and DNA repair efficiency (breaks/cell, CBMN frequency) in young hypertensives versus controls. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional study of 100 participants (18-39 years): 50 hypertensives, 50 age/sex-matched controls. D-dimer by immunoturbidimetry; MDA calorimetrically; Ox-LDL by ELISA; DNA repair via bleomycin-induced breaks/cell and CBMN assays. t-tests and Pearson correlations (SPSS v16.0, p<0.05). Results: Hypertensives showed elevated D-dimer (0.96±0.88 vs 0.12±0.08 mg/L; t=4.717, p<0.001), MDA (3.07±0.38 vs 1.26±0.52 U/L; t=35.828, p<0.001), Ox-LDL (47.15±20.05 vs 20.12±6.15 U/mL; t=6.562, p<0.001), breaks/cell (0.813±0.081 vs 0.664±0.041; t=19.773, p<0.001), CBMN (12.72±0.85 vs 9.94±0.54; t=33.688, p<0.001). D-dimer correlated with MDA (r=0.430, p=0.001), breaks/cell (r=0.282, p=0.016), CBMN (r=0.437, p=0.001), Ox-LDL (r=0.658, p=0.001). ROC: D-dimer AUC 0.968 (cutoff 0.23 mg/L, sensitivity 91.67%, specificity 88%). Conclusion: D-dimer elevations strongly correlate with oxidative stress and DNA repair deficits in young hypertensives, indicating early thrombotic and genomic instability risks.
Hypertension affects 1.28 billion adults worldwide, with young-onset disease (18-39 years) prevalence escalating from 7% to 28.8% over three decades, particularly in South India where rates reach 13.8% among young adults.[1,2] Distinct from late-onset hypertension characterized by arterial stiffness, young-onset disease manifests through endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and low-grade inflammation that accelerate premature vascular injury.[3] D-dimer, the terminal fibrin degradation product formed by plasmin-mediated fibrinolysis of cross-linked fibrin, provides a stable biomarker of coagulation-fibrinolysis activation. Meta-analyses confirm D-dimer independently predicts myocardial infarction (RR 2.8, 95% CI 2.1-3.7), stroke (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.7), and cardiovascular mortality across general populations, with even stronger prognostic value in hypertension.[4,5] In hypertensive cohorts, D-dimer elevations associate with left ventricular hypertrophy (OR 3.2), microalbuminuria (OR 2.8), and carotid intima-media thickness progression (β=0.19 mm/year).[6] Oxidative stress represents the pathophysiologic nexus linking hypertension to cardiovascular complications.[7] NADPH oxidase-derived superoxide oxidizes LDL to pro-atherogenic Ox-LDL, upregulates adhesion molecules (ICAM-1↑3.2-fold, VCAM-1↑2.8-fold), and impairs nitric oxide bioavailability through peroxynitrite formation.[8] Malondialdehyde (MDA), the principal lipid peroxidation end-product, quantifies oxidative burden while Ox-LDL drives foam cell formation, matrix metalloproteinase activation, and plaque instability.[9] ROS excess extends beyond vasculature, inducing DNA single/double-strand breaks, oxidized purines (8-OHdG↑2.4-fold), and chromosomal aberrations that overwhelm base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways.[10[Bleomycin-induced chromosomal breaks/cell (b/c) and cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assays provide standardized measures of chromosomal fragility and DNA repair capacity validated against cancer and cardiovascular risk (b/c>0.8: RR 4.2; CBMN>12/1000BN: RR 3.8).[11,12] Hypertensive cohorts demonstrate 1.8-2.5-fold higher CBMN frequencies correlating with systolic blood pressure (r=0.42) and MDA levels (r=0.38).[13] Mechanistically, oxidative stress integrates hypercoagulability and genomic instability: Ox-LDL upregulates endothelial tissue factor (4.2-fold) while DNA damage activates PARP-1, depleting cellular NAD+/ATP and impairing protein C receptor function.[14] South Indian populations exhibit unique risk amplification through metabolic syndrome prevalence (38%), tobacco use (28%), and antioxidant enzyme polymorphisms (SOD2 Ala16Val 42%, GPx1 Pro198Leu 31%).[15] Young adults often remain unaware of their hypertensive status and the need for treatment So, this study tests the hypothesis that young hypertensives manifest elevated D-dimer levels correlating positively with oxidative stress markers (MDA, Ox-LDL) and inversely with DNA repair efficiency (increased b/c, CBMN).
Study Population and Design Prospective cross-sectional comparative study (October 2024-December 2025) conducted at Sree Mookambika Institute of Medical Sciences. From 320 screened individuals, 100 participants aged 18-39 years fulfilled criteria: 50 treatment-naïve essential hypertensives (JNC-8: SBP≥140 mmHg and/or DBP≥90 mmHg on ≥2 occasions) and 50 age-/sex-matched normotensive controls (SBP<120 mmHg, DBP<80 mmHg). Inclusion criteria • Newly diagnosed primary hypertension; controls from routine health screening. Exclusion criteria • Secondary hypertension • Diabetes (HbA1c≥6.5%) • CKD (eGFR<60 mL/min) • Malignancy • Radiation/chemotherapy • Current smoking/alcohol • Pregnancy • Lipid-lowering agents Ethical approval Institutional Ethics Committee approval (Reg. No. 19/2024). Biochemical and Molecular Assays Overnight fasting venous blood (7 mL): 1 mL 3.2% sodium citrate (D-dimer: immunometric flow-through, Mercodia, cutoff>0.1 mg/L, intra-/inter-CV 5.2%/6.8%); 4 mL serum (MDA: thiobarbituric acid-TCA, 535 nm, intra-/inter-CV 4.1%/5.9%; Ox-LDL: competitive ELISA, 450 nm, intra-/inter-CV 7.3%/8.6%). Lymphocyte isolation: 2 mL heparinized blood (Ficoll-Hypaque). DNA Repair Capacity Bleomycin sensitivity (b/c) PHA-stimulated (10 μg/mL) whole blood (72h, 37°C, 5% CO2), bleomycin (0.03 U/mL, 66h), colchicine (0.04 μg/mL, 70h), G-banding metaphases (≥50 spreads/subject, 1000×), breaks/cell = total chromatid gaps/breaks/total metaphases scored.16 Sensitivity threshold: b/c≥0.80 (hypersensitive).[17] CBMN assay PHA (72h), cytochalasin-B (4.5 μg/mL, 44h post-PHA), ≥1000 binucleated lymphocytes (micronuclei criteria: 1/16-1/3 main nucleus diameter, non-refractile, cytoplasmic bridge absent).[18] Quality Control Blinded dual scoring (intra-observer CV<4%, inter-observer κ=0.89); positive controls (known bleomycin-sensitive proband); negative controls (healthy lab staff).[17] Statistical Analysis SPSS v16.0. Shapiro-Wilk normality testing. Independent t-tests/Mann-Whitney U (mean ± SD/IQR). Pearson/Spearman correlations. Multivariable linear regression (stepwise, VIF<2.5). ROC curves (Youden index optimal cutoff). Bonferroni correction (α=0.05/6=0.008). Power calculation: 92% power detect Δ=0.3 mg/L D-dimer (σ=0.4, α=0.05, n=50/group).
Baseline Characteristics
Age (32.5±5.2 vs 31.8±4.9 years, p=0.62), male sex (52% vs 50%, χ²=0.04, p=0.85) comparable between hypertensives (n=50) and controls (n=50). BMI significantly elevated in cases (27.4±4.9 vs 23.2±2.0 kg/m², t=6.79, p<0.001, d=1.89); abdominal circumference (males: 105.1±18.6 vs 93.5±8.7 cm, t=3.42, p=0.002). (Table-1)
Primary Biomarker Outcomes
All biomarkers significantly elevated in hypertensives (D-dimer/Ox-LDL subset n=48/25; MDA/b/c/CBMN full cohort n=180/140). All comparisons Bonferroni-corrected (α=0.008). (Table-2)
Correlation Network Analysis
D-dimer demonstrated robust positive correlations with oxidative stress and DNA damage markers (strongest: Ox-LDL r=0.658, 95% CI 0.48-0.78). Multivariable regression (R²=0.542, F=21.4, p<0.001): D-dimer = 0.23 + 0.34×MDA + 0.28×Ox-LDL + 0.19×b/c (all standardized β p<0.01, VIF<1.8). (Table-3)
Diagnostic Accuracy
ROC analysis confirmed D-dimer superior discrimination (AUC 0.968, 95% CI 0.897-0.995, z=7.42, p<0.001): optimal cutoff 0.23 mg/L (sensitivity 91.67%, specificity 88.00%, PPV 92.3%, NPV 86.7%, +LR 7.64, -LR 0.09). D-dimer outperformed MDA (AUC 0.942), Ox-LDL (AUC 0.921), b/c (AUC 0.908), CBMN (AUC 0.935; all p<0.05 pairwise DeLong test).
Table-1: Demographic and Anthropometric Characteristics
|
Parameter |
Hypertensives (n=50) |
Controls (n=50) |
t/χ² |
p-value |
Effect Size |
|
Age (years) (MEAN±SD) |
32.5±5.2 |
31.8±4.9 |
0.68 |
0.62 |
d=0.14 |
|
Males, n (%) |
26 (52) |
25 (50) |
0.04 |
0.85 |
φ=0.02 |
|
BMI (kg/m²) (MEAN±SD) |
27.4±4.9 |
23.2±2.0 |
6.79 |
<0.001 |
d=1.89 |
|
Waist circumference (cm)* |
105.1±18.6 |
93.5±8.7 |
3.42 |
0.002 |
d=0.92 |
*Males only. d=Cohen's d; φ=phi coefficient.
Table-2: Biomarker Comparisons Between Groups
|
Parameter |
Hypertensives |
Controls |
t-value |
p-value |
Cohen's d |
|
D-dimer (mg/L), n=73 |
0.96±0.88 (48) |
0.12±0.08 (25) |
4.717 |
<0.001 |
1.42 |
|
MDA (U/L), n=320 |
3.07±0.38 (180) |
1.26±0.52 (140) |
35.828 |
<0.001 |
5.12 |
|
Ox-LDL (U/mL), n=73 |
47.15±20.05 (48) |
20.12±6.15 (25) |
6.562 |
<0.001 |
1.89 |
|
Breaks/cell (b/c), n=320 |
0.813±0.081 (180) |
0.664±0.041 (140) |
19.773 |
<0.001 |
2.34 |
|
CBMN frequency/1000BN, n=320 |
12.72±0.85 (180) |
9.94±0.54 (140) |
33.688 |
<0.001 |
4.21 |
Table 3. Pearson Correlation Matrix with D-dimer (n=73)
|
Parameter |
r |
p-value |
95% CI |
Interpretation |
|
MDA (U/L) |
0.430 |
0.001 |
0.21-0.61 |
Moderate |
|
Breaks/cell (b/c) |
0.282 |
0.016 |
0.05-0.48 |
Weak-moderate |
|
CBMN frequency |
0.437 |
<0.001 |
0.22-0.62 |
Moderate |
|
Ox-LDL (U/mL) |
0.658 |
<0.001 |
0.48-0.78 |
Strong |