Background: Cutaneous vasculitis comprises of different clinico-pathological spectrum with some of them leading on to serious multi systemic consequences. Skin biopsy always plays an important first line investigation for the above diagnostic approach. This study emphasizes the role of histopathology in various differential diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis as the treatment differs in each and this plays an important role in the patient care and management. Moreover, the relevance of clinical input is also important for correct diagnosis. Methods: This is a study which includes 80 skin biopsies clinically diagnosed as primary and secondary cutaneous vasculitis. Based on clinical presentations, the lesions were classified according to their morphological appearance (pustules, bulla, plaques. targetoid lesions, macules, purpuric spots, papules) . Histopathological sections were reviewed looking into the size of the blood vessels and the predominant cellular infiltrate,whether they are neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes or histiocytes.Other relevant findings like presence of granulomas, extravasation of Red Blood Cells(RBC) and presence of fibrinoid necrosis were also noted Result: Out of the total 80 skin biopsies clinically diagnosed as cutaneous vasculitis,most of them were primary rather than associated with systemic manifestations.Plaques like lesions were the most common clinical presentation.. Based on our histopathological findings, small vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis, extravasation of RBC’s and fibrinoid necrosis were the common findings. Conclusion: Clinicopathological co-relation and proper histopathological evaluation are necessary to arrive at a correct diagnosis to initiate appropriate treatment for the patient. Skin biopsy is the golden standard for diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis.
Cutaneous vasculitis comprises of different clinical pathological spectrum with some of them leading on to serious multi systemic involvement. Skin biopsy always plays an important first line investigation for the above diagnosis. This study emphasises the role of histopathology in various differential diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis as the treatment plan differs in each of them. Moreover, the relevance of clinical input is also important for correct diagnosis. The aim of this study is to emphasise the role of histopathology in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis and to correlate it with clinicopathological findings.
This study was conducted in the department of Pathology in a teaching hospital of South India. There were 80 skin biopsies which were clinically diagnosed as primary and secondary cutaneous vasculitis. It is a retrospective study over five years. The clinical history and details were collected from the medical records section. The histopathological details were analyzed by pathologists from the stained haematoxylin and eosin slides
Based on clinical presentation the lesions were classified according to their clinical symptoms and morphological appearance. The parameters used were based on clinical presentation as pustules, bulla, plaques, targetoid lesions, macules, purpuric spots and papules. Histopathological sections there were classified based on the size of the blood vessels, nature of cellular infiltrate, extravasation of RBC’s fibrinoid necrosis. The predominant cellular infiltrate was noted,whether it was neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes or histiocytes.Presence of granulomas, extravasation of RBC’s and fibrinoid necrosis were also noted.
The total numbers of skin biopsies in a 5 year period were 1835, out of which there were 80 cases of cutaneous vasculitis .The clinical profile and histopathological study were analyzed on these 80 cases(4%). The clinical profile included clinical symptoms and presentation, morphological appearance like hyper pigmented or hypo pigmented, multiple or single, papule, purpura, macules, pustules and bulla. Histopathological classification was based on size of the vessel(large vessel, medium vessel or capillaries), nature of cellular infiltrate, extravasation of RBC’s and fibrinoid necrosis.
Age wise distribution of cutaneous vasculitis showed that there were 26 cases (33%) in the age group of more than 50 years and for less than 50 years of age,there were 54 cases (65%). Sex distribution showed a slight female predominance with 43cases (54%) and males were 37 cases (46%). Patients who had painful lesions were 25 cases (31%) and without painless lesions were seen in 55 cases (69%). The location of the lesion were over the extremities in 59 cases (75%) and central lesions were noted in 21 cases (25%). Multiple lesions observed in 58 cases (72%) and single lesions were observed in 22 cases (28%). Some the patients had extra cutaneous manifestations,as seen in 47cases (59%) like hypertension, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, hyperthyroidism. Pure cutaneous manifestations were seen in 33cases (41%). Purpura were seen in 25cases (31% ), plaques in 25cases (31% ), papules in 12 cases (15% ) , macules in7 cases (8% ), pustules in 6 cases (9% ), bulla in 5 cases (6% ).
Histopathological study showed all the 80 cases of cutaneous vasculitis were of small artery vasculitis. Microscopically inflammatory cells around the vessels were neutrophils as seen in 99 cases (69%), neutrophils with eosinophils in 39 cases (27%), neutrophils with karyorrhexis were seen in 5cases (4%), others like lymphocytes, plasma cells were rare accounting for 4%.Extravasation of RBC’s were seen in 72 cases(65%) and with fibrinoid necrosis in 38cases (35%)
Cutaneous vasculitis occurs in all age groups and has an incidence ranging from 15.4 to 29.7 cases per million per year. Slight female predominance is seen and adults are more affected than children(1,2) The mean age of adults is 47 years and in children it is 7 years.Cutaneous vascular injuries are divided into : Vasculitis and Vasculopathy .Vasculitis is characterized by damage and inflammation of the blood vessels related to inflammation, whereas in vasculopathy blood vessel damage is not evident .(3) Cutaneous vasculitis comprise of inflammation of blood vessel walls within the skin , their surrounding tissues and other organs like the kidney, lung and heart.(1) There are two types of vasculitis as seen in patients, one is primary vasculitis- based on size of the vessel and without any identifiable causes and the secondary vasculitis which is stimulated by bacterial, viral infection, drugs, malignancy, connective tissue diseases and systemic autoimmune disease ,which is also systemic or with extra cutaneous manifestations .(4)
Approach to diagnosis to small vessel cutaneous vasculitis is a diagnosis of exclusion which needs a complete evaluation to rule out various multiple other causes. (10)(3) To start diagnosing a case of vasculitis a complete patient history, general examination, physical examination, selected laboratory studies, a skin biopsy- which is examined by light microscopy and direct immunofluorescence are much needed.(5)Clinical systemic symptoms of the patient like fever, malaise, weight loss, arthritis, arthralgias combined with cutaneous and extra cutaneous manifestations of sign and symptoms with association of metabolic diseases like diabetic mellitus, hypertension, hypo/hyper thyroid ,obesity, rheumatoid arthritis has to be considered too in the diagnostic panel. The most common site for a vasculitic lesion are the lower extremities ,which is the dependent site. The other parts like the upper extremities , trunk, head and neck are less common.(8) The lesions can be single or multiple in different parts of the body.
The laboratory screening of the patient must include complete blood count with differentials, erythrocyte sedimentation rate ,urine analysis, liver function test, renal function test, serum creatinine,hepatitis B and C cultures (blood and urine), skin biopsy (two biopsy one for H and E staining another for direct immunofluorescence) , stool guaiac and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs).In suspected cases of small vessel cutaneous vasculitis, a skin biopsy is often done . Other site of biopsies are kidney ,lung and heart .The main reason for a skin biopsy is the necessity to confirm vasculitis and is to exclude the other causes of the skin lesion.(6) Skin biopsy plays an important role in few vasculitis syndrome having clinical, radiographic and laboratory findings, therefore accurate diagnosis of vasculitis requires histological confirmation. But skin biopsy should always be correlated with clinical history, physical and laboratory findings to arrive at specific diagnosis. (1,2)
The procedure of a skin biopsy is simple with minimum risk of complications like bleeding, ulceration or infection. A 4 mm punch or a shave biopsy extending to subcutis is sufficient for the diagnosis of cutaneous small vessel vasculitis of a purpuric papule, which has presented within 24 to 48 hours. The timing and type of the biopsy sample taken, are the two factors which has an effect on the results, because skin biopsy taken too early or too late will not contribute to the histologic features. If possible two biopies specimen should be taken , one for haematoxylin and eosin and light microscopic diagnosis, another biopsy for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) .(7) For direct immunofluorescence , maximum yield is obtained when biopsy of the lesion is done in less than 48 hours. Skin biopsy older than a week is less likely to contribute to diagnosis.(8)(9)
Histopathological findings that sub classify vasculitis are based on the size/caliber of the blood vessel affected . Cutaneous vasculitis could be small vessel vasculitis, medium vessel vasculitis or large vessel vasculitis.The type of blood vessels may be arterial or venous .The anatomic location of the affected blood vessel can be dermal or subcutaneous(3). Among these the cutaneous small vessel vasculitis (CSVV) is the commonest .(1) The vessels affected are arterioles, capillaries and post capillary venules. The two important criteria essential for histological assessment of cutaneous vasculitis are perivascular inflammatory cell infiltrate within and around blood vessel (neutrophilic, eosinophilic, lymphocytic, histiocytic or mixed) and fibrinoid necrosis within and around the vessel walls(necrosis of vessel wall with deposition of fibrinoid material) .Other changes often present are disruption or destruction of the vessel walls, leuokocytoclasis (nuclear dust), red cell extravasation(sign of damage), damage and swelling of endothelial cells of the vessel walls and the surrounding tissue, edema and luminal thrombosis.(3)(1)
Direct immunofluorescence in a cutaneous biopsy is needed in cases where the diagnosis of the lesion is difficult. The lesions are associated with the immune complexes and also help in detection of very early lesions. The most common immunooreactants are IgM,C3 and fibrin. IgM is important for Rheumatoid Factor(RF )associated disease;C3 is more suggestive of HUV (hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis) and fibrin .Long term follow up of the patient is necessary for the management of the patient as recurrence rate is increased especially with chronic disease. .The treatment modalities include bed rest, NSAIDs, analgesics, antihistaminics , immunosuppressants,colchicine ,dapsone and corticosteroids ( predisone) for a definitive cure.
Clinicopathological co-relation and proper histopathological evaluation are necessary to arrive at a correct diagnosis to initiate appropriate treatment for the patient. Skin biopsy is the golden standard for diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis. For a correct interpretation of the biopsy report, one should be aware of essential features of vasculitis and in doubtful cases can review with a dermatopathologist. Essential histological information from skin biopsy and direct immunofluorescence with clinical findings enables more precise and accurate diagnosis of localized and systemic vasculitis syndrome.