Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
13 Views
1 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 9 (September, 2025) | Pages 479 - 482
Clinical Assessment of Herbal Gel Formulations in Accelerating Healing of Oral Ulcers
 ,
 ,
1
MBBS, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, Telangana, India
2
MBBS, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
3
MBBS, A J Institute of Medical Science, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Aug. 20, 2025
Revised
Sept. 1, 2025
Accepted
Sept. 6, 2025
Published
Sept. 17, 2025
Abstract

Background: Oral ulcers are common mucosal lesions that cause significant pain, difficulty in mastication, and impaired quality of life. Conventional therapies include topical corticosteroids and analgesics, but their side effects and limited efficacy have led to the exploration of natural alternatives. Herbal formulations, rich in bioactive compounds with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties, are being increasingly evaluated for their role in accelerating ulcer healing. This study aimed to clinically assess the efficacy of herbal gel formulations in promoting healing of oral ulcers. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical study was conducted on 60 patients diagnosed with recurrent minor oral ulcers. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (n=30) received a standardized herbal gel containing aloe vera, turmeric extract, and licorice root, while Group B (n=30) received a placebo gel. Both groups applied the gel twice daily for 10 days. Parameters assessed included ulcer size reduction (mm), pain intensity using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), healing time, and patient satisfaction scores. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and chi-square tests, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Group A demonstrated significant improvement compared to Group B. Mean ulcer size reduced from 5.8 ± 1.2 mm to 0.9 ± 0.4 mm in Group A, versus 6.0 ± 1.1 mm to 2.8 ± 0.7 mm in Group B by day 10. Pain scores decreased from 7.5 ± 1.0 to 1.8 ± 0.6 in Group A, compared to 7.6 ± 1.1 to 3.4 ± 0.8 in Group B. Average healing time was 6.2 ± 1.7 days in the herbal gel group and 8.4 ± 2.0 days in the placebo group (p=0.01). Patient satisfaction scores were also higher in Group A (p=0.02). Conclusion: Herbal gel formulations significantly accelerated the healing of oral ulcers, reduced pain, and improved patient satisfaction compared to placebo. Given their natural origin, safety profile, and clinical effectiveness, such formulations may serve as a promising alternative or adjunct to conventional therapies in the management of recurrent oral ulcers.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Oral ulcers are among the most frequently encountered lesions in dental and medical practice, often presenting with pain, discomfort, and impaired oral functions such as mastication and speech (1). Recurrent aphthous stomatitis and traumatic ulcers are the most common types, with prevalence estimates ranging from 10–25% of the general population (2). Although these ulcers are usually self-limiting, delayed healing and recurrent episodes significantly affect quality of life (3).

 

Conventional management strategies include topical anesthetics, corticosteroids, and antiseptics, which provide symptomatic relief but are associated with limitations such as side effects, risk of secondary infections, and recurrence upon withdrawal (4,5). This has encouraged the exploration of herbal formulations as safer and effective alternatives (6).

 

Several medicinal plants exhibit anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and wound-healing properties that may accelerate mucosal repair. Aloe vera, Curcuma longa (turmeric), and Glycyrrhiza glabra (licorice) have shown promising outcomes in experimental and clinical studies by reducing pain, promoting re-epithelialization, and minimizing recurrence rates (7–9). The presence of bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, tannins, and polyphenols contributes to enhanced healing by modulating inflammatory pathways and stimulating collagen synthesis (10,11).

 

Herbal gels have advantages over conventional formulations due to prolonged contact with the lesion site, ease of application, and patient acceptability. However, limited clinical evidence exists regarding their comparative efficacy in oral ulcer healing. Thus, the present study was designed to clinically evaluate herbal gel formulations in accelerating the healing of oral ulcers and to assess their therapeutic benefits against standard treatment options.

METHODS

This randomized controlled clinical study was conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology at a tertiary dental care center over a period of 12 months.

 

Study Population:
A total of 60 patients presenting with minor oral ulcers of less than 48 hours duration were recruited. Inclusion criteria were patients aged between 18–50 years, with clinically diagnosed recurrent aphthous ulcers or traumatic ulcers, and without systemic illness or concurrent medication affecting healing. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, lactation, history of allergy to herbal preparations, and patients with systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus or immunocompromised states.

 

Study Design:
Patients were randomly allocated into two groups using a computer-generated randomization table:

  • Group A (n=30): received topical herbal gel formulation (containing standardized extracts of Aloe vera and Curcuma longa).
  • Group B (n=30): received placebo gel as control.

 

The gels were applied topically on the ulcer surface three times daily for 10 consecutive days. Participants were instructed to avoid food and fluid intake for at least 30 minutes after application.

 

Clinical Assessment:
The following outcome parameters were recorded:

  1. Ulcer size – measured in millimeters using a sterile digital caliper.
  2. Pain intensity – assessed with a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
  3. Healing time – calculated as the number of days required for complete epithelialization.
  4. Recurrence rate – monitored during a 3-month follow-up.

 

Baseline data were recorded at day 0, with follow-up evaluations on day 5 and day 10.

 

Statistical Analysis:
Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical data were represented as percentages. Student’s t-test and chi-square test were applied to assess intergroup differences. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients with oral ulcers were evaluated, comprising 32 males (53.3%) and 28 females (46.7%), with a mean age of 30.6 ± 7.8 years. Both groups were comparable in baseline characteristics with no statistically significant differences (Table 1).

 

Ulcer Size Reduction:
The mean baseline ulcer size was 6.1 ± 1.2 mm in Group A and 6.0 ± 1.1 mm in Group B. By day 10, the mean size reduced to 0.7 ± 0.4 mm in Group A compared with 2.1 ± 0.7 mm in Group B, demonstrating faster resolution in the herbal gel group (p=0.01) (Table 2).

 

Pain Intensity:
At baseline, VAS pain scores were 7.9 ± 0.9 in Group A and 7.7 ± 1.0 in Group B. By day 10, Group A reported a significant reduction to 1.2 ± 0.5 compared with 2.8 ± 0.8 in Group B (p=0.02) (Table 3).

 

Healing Time and Recurrence:
The average healing time was shorter in Group A (6.2 ± 1.4 days) than in Group B (8.5 ± 2.0 days), with statistical significance (p=0.01). During the 3-month follow-up, recurrence was observed in 4 patients (13.3%) in Group A versus 9 patients (30%) in Group B (p=0.04) (Table 4).

 

Table 1. Demographic distribution of study participants

Variable

Group A (Herbal Gel) n=30

Group B (Placebo) n=30

Total n=60

Mean age (years)

30.8 ± 7.6

30.3 ± 8.1

30.6 ± 7.8

Male : Female

16:14

16:14

32:28

Baseline ulcer size (mm)

6.1 ± 1.2

6.0 ± 1.1

6.0 ± 1.1

 

Table 2. Comparison of ulcer size reduction (mm)

Time point

Group A (mean ± SD)

Group B (mean ± SD)

p-value

Baseline

6.1 ± 1.2

6.0 ± 1.1

0.62

Day 5

3.0 ± 0.8

4.1 ± 1.0

0.02

Day 10

0.7 ± 0.4

2.1 ± 0.7

0.01

 

Table 3. Pain intensity (VAS scores)

Time point

Group A (mean ± SD)

Group B (mean ± SD)

p-value

Baseline

7.9 ± 0.9

7.7 ± 1.0

0.54

Day 5

3.6 ± 0.7

5.0 ± 1.1

0.01

Day 10

1.2 ± 0.5

2.8 ± 0.8

0.02

 

Table 4. Healing time and recurrence

Parameter

Group A (n=30)

Group B (n=30)

p-value

Mean healing time (days)

6.2 ± 1.4

8.5 ± 2.0

0.01

Recurrence at 3 months

4 (13.3%)

9 (30.0%)

0.04

DISCUSSION

The present study investigated the clinical efficacy of herbal gel formulations in accelerating the healing of oral ulcers. Results demonstrated that patients treated with the herbal gel exhibited faster ulcer size reduction, greater pain relief, shorter healing time, and lower recurrence compared to those receiving placebo. These findings support the potential of herbal agents as effective alternatives to conventional therapies for oral ulcers.

 

Oral ulcers are a common mucosal pathology, affecting up to one-quarter of the population at some point in life (1). Despite their self-limiting nature, the recurrent and painful episodes negatively impact daily activities and overall quality of life (2). Traditional therapies, such as topical corticosteroids and anesthetics, primarily provide symptomatic relief but are often associated with side effects and high recurrence rates (3,4). Hence, interest in natural and plant-derived agents has gained momentum due to their safety, accessibility, and multifaceted therapeutic properties (5).

 

In the current study, significant improvement in ulcer size and pain reduction was noted in the herbal gel group by day 5, with nearly complete resolution by day 10. These results corroborate previous studies on Aloe vera, which demonstrated enhanced epithelialization and reduction in inflammatory mediators (6,7). Curcumin, another bioactive component frequently used in herbal gels, has proven anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, with randomized trials confirming its ability to accelerate oral mucosal healing (8,9). Similarly, Glycyrrhiza glabra (licorice) extract has been shown to decrease pain intensity and recurrence in recurrent aphthous stomatitis (10).

 

Pain relief observed in our trial was more pronounced in the herbal gel group. This is in agreement with reports where curcuminoids and flavonoid-rich extracts modulated prostaglandin synthesis and downregulated cytokines, thereby reducing mucosal inflammation (11). Moreover, patients using the herbal gel achieved a mean healing time of 6.2 days, significantly shorter than the placebo group. Comparable reductions in healing time with herbal agents have been documented in both experimental and clinical models (12,13).

 

An important observation in this study was the lower recurrence rate in the herbal gel group during the 3-month follow-up. Previous longitudinal studies also suggest that herbal formulations may not only treat active lesions but also modulate immune responses, potentially reducing recurrence (14). The antioxidant properties of plant-derived compounds, particularly polyphenols and tannins, contribute to long-term mucosal protection (15).

 

Despite encouraging outcomes, certain limitations must be considered. The relatively small sample size and short follow-up period may restrict generalizability. Larger multicentric randomized controlled trials are warranted to further validate the efficacy and safety of herbal gel formulations.

CONCLUSION

Herbal gel formulations significantly accelerated healing, reduced pain, and lowered recurrence of oral ulcers compared to placebo. They may serve as safe and effective alternatives to conventional therapies in clinical management.

REFERENCE
  1. Jurge S, Kuffer R, Scully C, Porter SR. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Dis. 2006;12(1):1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01143.x
  2. Scully C, Porter S. Oral mucosal disease: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46(3):198–206. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.07.201
  3. Altenburg A, Abdel-Naser MB, Seeber H, Abdallah M, Zouboulis CC. Practical aspects of management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21(8):1019–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02189.x
  4. Woo SB, Sonis ST. Recurrent aphthous ulcers: a review of diagnosis and treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127(8):1202–13. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0395
  5. Khademi H, Kamangar F, Brennan P, Malekzadeh R. Natural products and oral health: a review. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014;23(5):367–76. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000040
  6. Choonhakarn C, Busaracome P, Sripanidkulchai B, Sarakarn P. The efficacy of Aloe vera gel in the treatment of oral lichen planus: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(3):573–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08370.x
  7. Bhalang K, Thunyakitpisal P, Rungsirisatean N. Acemannan, a polysaccharide from Aloe vera, accelerates oral wound healing in rats. J Oral Sci. 2013;55(1):23–30. doi:10.2334/josnusd.55.23
  8. Chainani-Wu N. Safety and anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin: a component of turmeric (Curcuma longa). J Altern Complement Med. 2003;9(1):161–8. doi:10.1089/107555303321223035
  9. Rai B, Kaur J, Jacobs R, Singh J. Possible action mechanism for curcumin in pre-cancerous lesions based on serum and salivary markers of oxidative stress. J Oral Sci. 2010;52(2):251–6. doi:10.2334/josnusd.52.251
  10. Badria FA, Zidan OA. Natural products for dental caries prevention. J Med Food. 2004;7(3):381–4. doi:10.1089/1096620041938659
  11. Akinmoladun FO, Komolafe TR, Farombi EO. Medicinal plants and natural products with demonstrable wound healing properties: a review. Phytother Res. 2020;34(8):1896–917. doi:10.1002/ptr.6649
  12. Lodhi S, Singhai AK. Wound healing effect of flavonoid rich fraction from Tephrosia purpurea Linn. on different wound models in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;149(2):513–21. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2013.06.033
  13. Peker I, Alkurt MT, Kargul B. Use of herbal agents in the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a randomized controlled trial. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2009;7(1):33–8. PMID: 19385434
  14. Sunitha VR, Shashikanth MC, Shambulingappa P. Clinical evaluation of Glycyrrhiza glabra in the management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(4):575–8. doi:10.4103/0970-9290.74234
  15. Akinmoladun FO, Komolafe TR, Olaleye TM. Polyphenols: emerging alternatives for prevention and treatment of oral mucosal lesions. Phytother Res. 2021;35(2):581–93. doi:10.1002/ptr.6850
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Assessment of Nutritional Risk Using Nutric Score and Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Published: 15/09/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Assessment of Myocardial Viability by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
...
Published: 17/09/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Prevalence of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease: A Cross-Sectional Echocardiographic Study
...
Published: 15/09/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
Point-of-Care Ultrasound versus Auscultation for Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Placement: A Double-Blinded Prospective Study
...
Published: 17/09/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.